WhatsApp Tells Delhi High Courtroom It Doesn’t Percentage Private User Information With Facebook

Immediate messaging platform WhatsApp on Wednesday antagonistic in Delhi High Court docket a plea alleging that privacy of its customers has been threatened with the aid of a new privateness coverage announced by way of Facebook, saying guidelines were in the region, and the latter does not have access to any Information because it gives stop-to-give up encryption.

WhatsApp had made massive changes to its privateness coverage on August 25, the first time because it turned into acquired via Fb, giving customers the choice of sharing their account data with the social network giant. The messaging service gave its customers 30 days till September 25 to choose out of the coverage.

The submission changed into made earlier than a bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, who had been hearing a PIL towards WhatsApp’s recent selection to Percentage User Records with discerning organization Facebook.

Senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, appearing for WhatsApp, stated there are government regulations in place, and the application no longer Percentage users Personal messages, contents, pix or Facts with Facebook.

He stated WhatsApp best stocks a User’s name and the smartphone number with Fb. “WhatsApp does now not have to get right of entry to any Information because it presents end-to-quit encryption”.


“We simplest have to get entry to the man or woman’s name and variety which is likewise obtained via online consent. We’re abiding by the significant authorities’ guidelines for messenger apps. We are not coping with sensitive data at all,” Luthra stated, adding that “if any of the Users desires to opt-out of the brand new policy, he/she cannot be forced not to select that alternative”.

To this, the Courtroom asked WhatsApp to file a brief affidavit before September 20 explaining the factual role of the concerns raised inside the writ petition.

But, senior suggest Pratibha M Singh, performing for petitioners Karmanya Singh Sareen and Shreya Sethi, argued the messaging service changed into sharing the entire Information with Fb. However, customers choose out of the new policy.

The petitioners, customers of the famous Instantaneous messaging service, have alleged that WhatsApp, Facebook Inc, and Fb India on-line Pvt Ltd’s new Private coverage “compromises the rights of its users”, which is likewise a “very critical breach of policy”.


vital authorities standing counsel Kriti Man Singh, appearing for Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai), in response to a word issued searching for clarification at the amendment of the brand new privateness coverage, said: “session method on this regard goes on the issue”.

The Courtroom then stated if by using September 25, “you do no longer take any choice, then the petitioners’ worries will continue to be unresolved.”

The Court docket will take in the matter for in addition listening to on September 21.

At some stage in the brief hearing, Luthra refuted the petitioners’ allegations that thirteen-year-olds or young adults have been using WhatsApp messenger, and the Records may be misused.

“You can’t get a SIM in this country till you’re 18 years old. How can thirteen-yr-vintage use WhatsApp? And nobody forces everyone to use WhatsApp,” he said.

The plea has claimed that “the privacy policy is in stark evaluation to the privateness policy present from July 7, 2012. In its first revised change on August 25, 2016, Respondents (WhatsApp, Fb Inc and Facebook India Online Pvt Ltd) have introduced this policy which seriously compromises the rights of its customers and makes the privacy rights of users completely susceptible”.

the news coverage, which comes into force from September 25, has sought to trade the “maximum treasured, primary and critical characteristic” of WhatsApp, which began operations in 2010, via “unilaterally threatening to do away with the safety to privateness of details and Statistics of its users and sharing the same with Fb and all its organization corporations including for the reason of industrial advertising and marketing.” The plea sought a route to prohibit WhatsApp, Facebook Inc, and Fb India online Pvt Ltd from sharing, in any manner, the details and Facts of each form of subscribers with any entity, including Facebook or its family of groups.

Explorer. Beer trailblazer. Zombie expert. Internet lover. Unapologetic introvert. Alcohol fanatic. Tv ninja.Once had a dream of buying and selling sauerkraut in Ohio. Practiced in the art of building crickets in Nigeria. Gifted in donating wooden tops in Fort Walton Beach, FL. Spent 2001-2007 testing the market for corncob pipes for no pay. A real dynamo when it comes to managing catfish in Jacksonville, FL. Spent a year investing in yard waste for farmers.

Forgot Password